Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Cell Phone Radiation Labeling Approved
by San Francisco Board of Supervisors

San Francisco, California just became the first government body in the world requiring cell phones to be labeled by Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), or radiation level, despite intense lobbying from industry and business representatives up to a key Committee hearing and a “full court press” ahead of last week’s Board of Supervisors Meeting.

The new law will be phased in over the next 2 years, with large formula retailers to be the first to comply, followed by small independent businesses that sell mobile phones.Today’s vote was 10-1 for approval, with Supervisor Sean Elsbernd dissenting.

Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier had requested a one-week continuance to work out small business concerns and address liability issues. Alioto-Pier offered two amendments to the ordinance today: one specified that retailers found out of compliance would not be subject to criminal penalties; the other clarified that the city was not assuming any liability as a result of this requirement.

For advocate reaction, the dissenter’s view, and a brief expert interview, see KTVU’s TV segment report on the San Francisco cell phone labeling vote.

Findings of the San Francisco Ordinance on Retailers Duty to Disclose Specific Absorption Rate values for cell phones:

(a) Government agencies and scientific bodies in the European Union (EU) and Israel have recognized the potential harm of long-term exposure to radiation emitted from cell phones and, as a result, have issued warnings about their use, especially their use by children.
(b) The United States Federal Communications Commission (”the FCC”) has established a maximum allowable Specific Absorption rate (”SAR”) that manufacturers must disclose to the government when offering a portable wireless device (cell phone) for sale. The SAR is a value that corresponds to the relative amount of radiofrequency energy absorpted in the head or body of a user of a wireless handset. At the time of adoption of this ordinance, the FCC limit for public exposure from cellular telephones is an SAR level of 1.6 watts per kilogram (1.6 W/kg) for spatial peak (local) SAR, such as SAR in the user’s head, as averaged over any 1 gram of tissue.
(c) The SAR values for different makes and models of cell phones differ widely, but consumers are not able to make informed purchasing decisions because there is no requirement that the retailer provide the applicable SAR values to the consumer at the point when the consumer is deciding between various makes and models.
(d) Cell phones are an important communication tool, especially during emergencies, and radiation exposure from cell phones can be reduced by using a speakerphone or a headset, or by sending text messages.

2 Responses to “ Cell Phone Radiation Labeling Approved
by San Francisco Board of Supervisors ”

  1. [...] The first government body in the nation to require radiation information on cell phones got more press attention in the past week as CTIA, the California Wireless Association, retaliated by announcing it would no longer hold industry conventions in San Francisco. Part of CTIA vice president of public affairs John Walls’ statement: In fact, all phones sold legally in the U.S. must comply with the Federal Communications Commission’s safety standards for RF emissions. According to the FCC, all such compliant phones are safe phones as measured by these standards. The scientific evidence does not support point of sale requirements that would suggest some compliant phones are ’safer’ than other compliant phones based on RF emissions. [...]

  2. [...] for this year’s CTIA convention were already set when the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed an ordinance in June 2010 requiring consumer information a…. CTIA retaliated by announcing it would no longer hold conventions in San Francisco, and filed a [...]

Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>