San Francisco’s Precautionary Principle Policy in Play 2


San Francisco will consider a resolution asking the EPA and other federal agencies to establish safe, biologically based standards for radiofrequency exposure, and asking Congress to repeal portions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to allow state and local authorities to consider the health and environmental effects of wireless facilities. The resolution would be sent to the California Congressional Delegation for action and follow-up.

San Francisco was the first city in the nation to adopt a “Precautionary Principle”, now the first section of its Environmental Code, specifying an approach to decisionmaking as follows:

Where threats of serious or irreversible damage to people or nature exist, lack of full scientific certainty about cause and effect shall not be viewed as sufficient reason for the City to postpone cost effective measures to prevent the degradation of the environment or protect the health of its citizens. Any gaps in scientific data uncovered by the examination of alternatives will provide a guidepost for future research, but will not prevent the City from taking protective action. As new scientific data become available, the City will review its decisions and make adjustments when warranted.

Where there are reasonable grounds for concern, the precautionary approach to decision-making is meant to help reduce harm by triggering a process to select the least potential threat. The key elements of the Precautionary Principle approach to decision-making include:

1. Anticipatory Action: There is a duty to take anticipatory action to prevent harm. Government, business, and community groups, as well as the general public, share this responsibility.

2. Right to Know: The community has a right to know complete and accurate information on potential human health and environmental impacts associated with the selection of products, services, operations or plans. The burden to supply this information lies with the proponent, not with the general public.

3. Alternatives Assessment: An obligation exists to examine a full range of alternatives and select the alternative with the least potential impact on human health and the environment including the alternative of doing nothing.

4. Full Cost Accounting: When evaluating potential alternatives, there is a duty to consider all the reasonably foreseeable costs, including raw materials, manufacturing, transportation, use, cleanup, eventual disposal, and health costs even if such costs are not reflected in the initial price. Short- and long-term benefits and time thresholds should be considered when making decisions.

5. Participatory Decision Process: Decisions applying the Precautionary Principle must be transparent, participatory, and informed by the best available science and other relevant information.

Several researchers have called on the U.S. to adopt the “precautionary principle” (take action on the side of caution) in recommending that children not use cell phones and that cell towers be located away from residential areas and schools. Sunroom Desk advocated it as a starting point for evaluating wireless facility siting.