<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Dodges Their Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/11/24/fcc-dodges-their-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/11/24/fcc-dodges-their-issue/</link>
	<description>A Glendale, California Outlook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:48:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Law Firm That Represented Glendale, California on FCC Wireless Siting Issue Has Webpage on Cell Phone and Cell Tower Health Concerns &#124; Sunroom Desk</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/11/24/fcc-dodges-their-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Firm That Represented Glendale, California on FCC Wireless Siting Issue Has Webpage on Cell Phone and Cell Tower Health Concerns &#124; Sunroom Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=4171#comment-996</guid>
		<description>[...] EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE: When it issued its declaratory ruling on wireless siting proposals, the FCC once again explicitly refused to revisit antenna radiation concerns. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE: When it issued its declaratory ruling on wireless siting proposals, the FCC once again explicitly refused to revisit antenna radiation concerns. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
