The FCC unanimously approved the wireless industry’s petition to set time limits for local processing of cell site applications. While the FCC ratified time limits of 90 days for co-locations, and 150 days for new applications, it did not go along with the industry’s proposal that applications be “deemed approved” if prescribed time limits were exceeded.
A Los Angeles resident working to keep cell sites away from residential areas noted that remarks of all the commissioners demonstrated their interest with encouraging or “streamlining” deployment of infrastructure:
“Repeatedly, they used phrases such as the alleged pressing need to:
* cut local red tape
* accelerate deployment of networks
* remove obstacles to rolling out necessary ubiquitous infrastructure
* allow more robust deployment of antennas
* ease local roadblocks
* allow more platforms for antennas
* boost getting more infrastructure built
* speed up the ability of the industry to roll out new 4G networks”
Glendale joined with municipalities around the country, engaging expert counsel to advocate against this petition. No opposition was even mentioned by commissioners or wireless industry presenters. Multiple comments (here) submitted by citizens concerned with unknown future health effects of ubiquitous cell towers, and/or the erosion of local zoning rights, were also completely ignored at the meeting.
Just a day earlier, researchers held an international conference in Norway on the long-term effects of exposure to electromagnetic radiation, and a nationally-syndicated TV show featured a segment on the link between cell phones and cancer.
An analysis from the Coalition for Local Oversight of Utility Technologies (www.cloutnow.org):
Under the FCC’s ruling, a wireless carrier may now file a lawsuit in federal court if its application has not been approved by a local government in 90 days (3 months) for co-locations and 150 days (5 months) for new tower applications. However, under the FCC’s ruling the application is not automatically deemed granted after those deadlines. Instead, the courts are to treat each case according to the specifics involved and make any rulings accordingly, which presumably would mean courts have the option of sending the application back to the local planning authority to give them more time to process it.
Why were there no speakers in opposition at the FCC hearing? What were the experts retained by the municipalities across the country doing, and why were they not there?
That is a great question; wondered that myself as I watched the “hearing.” Perhaps opponents were told in advance that there would be no opportunity to speak and this was just going to be in the nature of an announcement of the FCC’s decision. There were people in the audience and even at the table set in front of the Commissioners, so this is unclear. But the fact that there was no effort by any Commissioners to address ANY of the strong opposition points (including the argument that FCC has no authority to issue any time deadlines) — coupled with the multiple references to the claimed need to cut red tape and speed up “ubiquitous infrastructure deployment” — was very troubling!
Pingback: Glendale Wireless Consultant Jonathan KramerNow Advising Culver City | Sunroom Desk
Pingback: Morgan Stanley's Mobile Internet Report Cites "Health/Environmental Issues" with Wireless Rollout | Sunroom Desk
Pingback: Glendale, California Sunroom Desk links on the upcoming FCC Broadband Plan | Sunroom Desk
Pingback: Burbank, California Planning Department Will Review Cell Site Application Process | Sunroom Desk
Pingback: Glendale, Los Angeles and LA County Join Arlington, Texas Fifth Circuit Appeal on Wireless Siting | Sunroom Desk
Does anyone know of an advocacy group or attorneys working to help communities against installation of these towers? There are plans to install another cell tower in our park. City council members afraid to go against them for fear of being sued. Need help – this is a children’s park – very close to residential community on all 4 sides.
Thank you,
Bonnie Kalem
310-614-1699
Pingback: Glendale Opposition to Cell Towers: Five Years Later, An International Research Study!
cupcake8million Posted on congrats- your linivg my dream since you won’t see your family/ friends for a long tie you could go cheesy- wish you were here or on the trail again or Where in the world is (your name)? Best of luck!