<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons for Glendale in Second Reading ofPasadena&#8217;s Proposed Wireless Ordinance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/05/19/lessons-for-glendale-in-second-reading-ofpasadenas-proposed-wireless-ordinance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/05/19/lessons-for-glendale-in-second-reading-ofpasadenas-proposed-wireless-ordinance/</link>
	<description>A Glendale, California Outlook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:34:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Third-Party Cell Phone App Offers Wireless Carrier Coverage Analysis; Glendale, California Wireless Ordinance Includes Provisions for Expert Review of Carrier Coverage Claims &#124; Sunroom Desk</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/05/19/lessons-for-glendale-in-second-reading-ofpasadenas-proposed-wireless-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Third-Party Cell Phone App Offers Wireless Carrier Coverage Analysis; Glendale, California Wireless Ordinance Includes Provisions for Expert Review of Carrier Coverage Claims &#124; Sunroom Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=1901#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>[...] residents who lobbied their city for cell tower justification studies sent along this CNET review of the interactive ROOT Wireless carrier coverage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] residents who lobbied their city for cell tower justification studies sent along this CNET review of the interactive ROOT Wireless carrier coverage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McMahon</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/05/19/lessons-for-glendale-in-second-reading-ofpasadenas-proposed-wireless-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>John McMahon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=1901#comment-349</guid>
		<description>In the situation in Glendale, Mayor Drayman explicitly said last year that the key issue is to establish clear legislation that does not result in staff members needing to use discretion in each case (or be subject to other pressures).  This is one area where Pasadena went wrong - and they set down this path a good year ago.  This wasn&#039;t a surprise, unfortunately, that this is where they ended up.

We live in a state where we have a community to look to (San Diego) who wrote an amazing ordinance years ago that is currently at the Supreme Court level.  It continues to amaze me that other cities don&#039;t look to this ordinance, as it is written, as a model.  Since none of the ordinances come anywhere close to San Diego&#039;s, each of these cities writing them (like Pasadena) immediately fall under the scrutiny that they must be in bed with telecom.

Let&#039;s hope Glendale gets it right.
I, for one, have hope.  We have good leadership here.

John McMahon
Cumberland Heights resident who T-Mobile (previously) was going to place a cell tower in front of my home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the situation in Glendale, Mayor Drayman explicitly said last year that the key issue is to establish clear legislation that does not result in staff members needing to use discretion in each case (or be subject to other pressures).  This is one area where Pasadena went wrong &#8211; and they set down this path a good year ago.  This wasn&#8217;t a surprise, unfortunately, that this is where they ended up.</p>
<p>We live in a state where we have a community to look to (San Diego) who wrote an amazing ordinance years ago that is currently at the Supreme Court level.  It continues to amaze me that other cities don&#8217;t look to this ordinance, as it is written, as a model.  Since none of the ordinances come anywhere close to San Diego&#8217;s, each of these cities writing them (like Pasadena) immediately fall under the scrutiny that they must be in bed with telecom.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Glendale gets it right.<br />
I, for one, have hope.  We have good leadership here.</p>
<p>John McMahon<br />
Cumberland Heights resident who T-Mobile (previously) was going to place a cell tower in front of my home</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cooney</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/05/19/lessons-for-glendale-in-second-reading-ofpasadenas-proposed-wireless-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=1901#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Excellent article and recommenation, Elise. Thank you.
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article and recommenation, Elise. Thank you.<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

