<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trash Site Alarm Ahead of Plans;Glendale Opposed to North Atwater Facility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/03/18/north-atwater-trash-site-alarms-unfounded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/03/18/north-atwater-trash-site-alarms-unfounded/</link>
	<description>A Glendale, California Outlook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:34:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Big Plans for West Glendale, California Border: Los Angeles River Revitalization, Griffith Park Bridge, North Atwater Redevelopment &#124; Sunroom Desk</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/03/18/north-atwater-trash-site-alarms-unfounded/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Plans for West Glendale, California Border: Los Angeles River Revitalization, Griffith Park Bridge, North Atwater Redevelopment &#124; Sunroom Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=1093#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>[...] of money): Atwater Village stakeholders have reservations about the city of LA redevelopment plans, Tom LaBonge&#8217;s proposal to establish a &#8220;waste to energy&#8221; plant in North Atwater is not completely off the table, and a high speed rail route determined some time in the future [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of money): Atwater Village stakeholders have reservations about the city of LA redevelopment plans, Tom LaBonge&#8217;s proposal to establish a &#8220;waste to energy&#8221; plant in North Atwater is not completely off the table, and a high speed rail route determined some time in the future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Atwater Versus River Glen: Who Wins? &#124; Sell My House Fast</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/03/18/north-atwater-trash-site-alarms-unfounded/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>North Atwater Versus River Glen: Who Wins? &#124; Sell My House Fast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=1093#comment-527</guid>
		<description>[...] beautification/revitalization has occurred, complains the blog, pointing to the proposed* and  controversial &#8220;waste-to-energy refuse facility.&#8221; Also, it seems like people just don&#8217;t like the name. Here&#8217;s what the blog says: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beautification/revitalization has occurred, complains the blog, pointing to the proposed* and  controversial &#8220;waste-to-energy refuse facility.&#8221; Also, it seems like people just don&#8217;t like the name. Here&#8217;s what the blog says: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

