<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed Pasadena Wireless Ordinance Is A Disgrace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/02/03/proposed-pasadena-wireless-ordinance-is-a-disgrace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/02/03/proposed-pasadena-wireless-ordinance-is-a-disgrace/</link>
	<description>A Glendale, California Outlook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:34:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: editor</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/02/03/proposed-pasadena-wireless-ordinance-is-a-disgrace/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=484#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Various municipal codes have their own definitions. I gather that Pasadena&#039;s definition includes antennas mounted on existing lampposts or poles because these support structures are &quot;ground-mounted.&quot; I do not know off-hand what the State or Federal definition is; I suggest you search through relevant laws in the California Public Utilities Code and FCC regulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Various municipal codes have their own definitions. I gather that Pasadena&#8217;s definition includes antennas mounted on existing lampposts or poles because these support structures are &#8220;ground-mounted.&#8221; I do not know off-hand what the State or Federal definition is; I suggest you search through relevant laws in the California Public Utilities Code and FCC regulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine Rondinella</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/02/03/proposed-pasadena-wireless-ordinance-is-a-disgrace/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine Rondinella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=484#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Would you please clarify the State and/or Federal definition of &quot;ground mounted&quot; for me - or at least instruct me as to where I might find said definition.

I have tried without success.

Thanks

Nadine Rondinella
Concerned Pasadena Resident</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you please clarify the State and/or Federal definition of &#8220;ground mounted&#8221; for me &#8211; or at least instruct me as to where I might find said definition.</p>
<p>I have tried without success.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Nadine Rondinella<br />
Concerned Pasadena Resident</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editor</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/02/03/proposed-pasadena-wireless-ordinance-is-a-disgrace/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=484#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Miriam. I hope that Pasadena city staff get firm direction from the council to come up with an ordinance that protects neighborhoods. Streamlining the permit process and imposing time limits on approvals sounds like a convenience for staff&#039;s benefit, not the citizens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Miriam. I hope that Pasadena city staff get firm direction from the council to come up with an ordinance that protects neighborhoods. Streamlining the permit process and imposing time limits on approvals sounds like a convenience for staff&#8217;s benefit, not the citizens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://sunroomdesk.com/2009/02/03/proposed-pasadena-wireless-ordinance-is-a-disgrace/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunroomdesk.com/?p=484#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Many thanks for giving the citizens of Pasadena a voice in your blog.  The support of Go ACT in the Pasadena Wireless fight has been invaluable.  The information and experiences shared by the different City groups fighting cell tower proliferation has been an unforgettable experience.  There has been no other time where I felt this level of comaraderie.  Homeowners become activists when a cell tower application is being processed by a City government.  I have never seen neighborhoods be so threatened by any other entity.  The old saying is united we stand divided we fall and that is the tactic the Telecoms have been using by targeting individual neighborhoods.  The telecoms have tried and true game plans of wearing down neighborhood opposition.  It can get Kafkaesque at times when your City government is not being pro-neighborhood and they are also trying to wear you down. I hope that the Glendale residents have lots of input into their Ordinance and get one that actually protects the citizens. La Raza</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for giving the citizens of Pasadena a voice in your blog.  The support of Go ACT in the Pasadena Wireless fight has been invaluable.  The information and experiences shared by the different City groups fighting cell tower proliferation has been an unforgettable experience.  There has been no other time where I felt this level of comaraderie.  Homeowners become activists when a cell tower application is being processed by a City government.  I have never seen neighborhoods be so threatened by any other entity.  The old saying is united we stand divided we fall and that is the tactic the Telecoms have been using by targeting individual neighborhoods.  The telecoms have tried and true game plans of wearing down neighborhood opposition.  It can get Kafkaesque at times when your City government is not being pro-neighborhood and they are also trying to wear you down. I hope that the Glendale residents have lots of input into their Ordinance and get one that actually protects the citizens. La Raza</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

